Will Biometric Privacy Survive Amid AI Regulatory Focus in 2025?

December 6, 2024

In 2024, the landscape of data privacy regulations in the United States saw significant developments, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). However, this surge in AI-related legislation has cast a shadow over efforts to regulate biometric data privacy comprehensively. As we look ahead to 2025, the future of biometric privacy remains uncertain, with state and federal policies in flux.

The Current State of Biometric Privacy Regulation

Progress in States Like Colorado and Illinois

Despite the overwhelming focus on AI, states like Colorado and Illinois have made notable strides in biometric data privacy. Illinois, often regarded as having the ‘gold standard’ in biometric data protection laws, passed amendments to its Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). These amendments limit the number of violations businesses can be found liable for under the private right of action, grouping multiple violations as a singular offense. This change benefits businesses by reducing potential liabilities.

In Colorado, significant advancements were made through comprehensive AI legislation targeting AI-powered discrimination and amendments to the Colorado Privacy Act. These amendments extend protections to biometric data, imposing business obligations such as creating retention and destruction policies, prohibiting the sale of biometric data, and ensuring reasonable security measures. Unlike Illinois’s BIPA, Colorado’s amendment does not include a private right of action. This divergence in state laws showcases a spectrum of approaches to biometric privacy willing to tackle unique state priorities and business climates.

The Impact of AI Legislation on Biometric Privacy

The legislative focus on AI in 2024 was overwhelming, with nearly 700 pieces of AI legislation introduced by state policymakers. This staggering volume underscores the urgency and importance placed on AI regulation, yet it also detracts attention from biometric data privacy. The absence of a federal privacy law that could offer standardized biometric data protections further complicates the situation. Although the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement on biometric data in May 2023, the federal stance remains ambiguous due to the impending implementation of AI regulations and the incoming presidential administration’s yet-to-be-determined policies.

In this environment of regulatory flux, businesses, policymakers, and privacy advocates face substantial challenges. Without a cohesive federal framework, states are left to independently address biometric data privacy, resulting in a patchwork of regulations that can be difficult for businesses to navigate. The intense focus on AI reflects a broader trend within technology regulation, where cutting-edge innovations draw legislative attention due to their far-reaching implications. Consequently, advancements in AI are overshadowing the critical work needed to protect biometric data, leaving its future uncertain as we approach 2025.

Emerging Technologies and Expanding Definitions

The Role of Virtual Reality and Extended Reality

As technological innovations continue to challenge existing definitions and protections, the trajectory of biometric data privacy is likely to hinge on both state innovations and federal policy evolutions. Advances in technologies such as virtual reality (VR) headsets that track body movements without necessarily storing identifying information pose emerging privacy implications. This broader perspective is driven by the need to encompass “body-based data” – information derived from characteristics of an individual that may not necessarily be used for identification.

These emerging technologies highlight the necessity of expanding the current definitions of biometric data. Virtual reality and extended reality are pushing the boundaries of conventional biometric definitions as these technologies evolve to include more sophisticated tracking capabilities. The use of body-based data for interactive and immersive experiences raises new questions about privacy and data security. Policymakers must consider whether existing laws and definitions are adequate to protect individuals in this fast-evolving technological landscape. The push for comprehensive regulations that address these nuances is becoming increasingly critical.

Colorado’s Progressive Stance on Neural Data Privacy

Colorado’s progressive stance on neural data privacy, a first in the U.S., exemplifies a forward-thinking approach that could influence national policies. This approach highlights the need for new terminologies and definitions, with extended reality and virtual reality tracking data pushing the boundaries of conventional biometric definitions. As we move into 2025, the legislative focus appears poised to include more comprehensive privacy laws with provisions for biometric privacy under their definitions of sensitive data.

Neural data privacy refers to the protection of data generated by neurotechnology devices that monitor or interact with the human nervous system. With Colorado taking steps to address this area, there is a clear recognition of the privacy risks associated with emerging neural technologies. These efforts may serve as a model for other states and potentially inform federal policy development. The inclusion of neural data within broader biometric privacy regulations underscores the evolving nature of privacy concerns as technology becomes more integrated with human physiology. By anticipating these changes, Colorado’s legislation represents a proactive stance in safeguarding citizens’ privacy rights.

The Federal Landscape and Future Directions

The Uncertain Federal Stance on Biometric Privacy

At the federal level, policy directions remain unpredictable, with the president-elect yet to appoint a new FTC chair. This choice will be critical in shaping how the FTC enforces biometric data protection laws and considers new forms of data, such as body data, within its regulatory framework. The potential shift in how federal authorities interpret and act on biometric data practices could have significant repercussions on both state and national privacy strategies.

The new FTC chair’s approach to data privacy will set the tone for federal involvement in biometric data regulation. The interplay between state and federal policies will be crucial in determining the overall effectiveness of privacy protections. If the federal stance aligns with more stringent state laws, it could lead to a more cohesive regulatory environment. Conversely, if the federal government adopts a more lenient approach, states may continue to spearhead privacy regulations, resulting in a fragmented landscape. Stakeholders must closely monitor these developments to adapt their strategies and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.

Anticipating Legislative Developments in 2025

The rapid increase in AI-related legislation has overshadowed comprehensive regulation efforts for biometric data privacy. This shift in focus has raised concerns among privacy advocates, as the collection and use of biometric data, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, and voiceprints, continue to grow.

Looking forward to 2025, the future of biometric privacy remains uncertain. Both state and federal policies are in a state of flux, with lawmakers grappling to balance the benefits of technological advancements with the need to protect personal privacy. Some states have taken the initiative to strengthen their biometric data privacy laws, while others have lagged behind, creating a patchwork of regulations across the country.

As the debate over data privacy intensifies, the challenge lies in crafting legislation that addresses the nuances of biometric data without stifling innovation or imposing undue burdens on businesses.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later